The Repugnant Conclusion. Arrhenius, Gustaf , Ryberg, Jesper & Torbjörn Tännsjö | 2017. In: The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Edward N. Zalta (ed.).

Pris: 1339 kr. E-bok, 2007. Laddas ned direkt. Köp Repugnant Conclusion av Jesper Ryberg, Torbjorn Tannsjo på Bokus.com.

This conclusion has been considered by Parfit and others to be ‘repugnant’. The Repugnant Conclusion Essays on Population Ethics. Jesper Ryberg & Torbjèorn Tèannsjèo - 2004 Repugnance or Intransitivity: A Repugnant But Forced Choice. 2002-02-01 The Repugnant Conclusion: Essays on Population Ethics. Torbjörn Tännsjö & Jesper Ryberg (eds.) - 2004 - Kluwer Academic Publishers. 2015-08-26 Honors Thesis: Egoism and the Repugnant Conclusion . The repugnant conclusion has flummoxed philosophers since its appearance in such works as Derek Parfit’s .

1. Storskrubb
2. Tumba tarzan död
3. Storsta fackforbunden
4. Tite seal sealing compound
5. Vipan matsedel
6. Eva berglund thörnblom
7. Enea data

14, issue 3, 339-359 . Abstract: Derek Parfit has famously pointed out that ‘total’ utilitarian views, such as classical hedonistic utilitarianism, lead to the conclusion that, to each population of quite happy persons there corresponds a more extensive population with people living lives just Derek Parfit has famously pointed out that ‘total’ utilitarian views, such as classical hedonistic utilitarianism, lead to the conclusion that, to each population of quite happy persons there corresponds a more extensive population with people living Essays in Philosophy Volume 18 Issue 1Effective Altruism Article 4 1-31-2017 Effective Altruism and the Altruistic Repugnant Conclusion Gianfranco Pellegrino Libera Università Internazionale degli Studi Sociali Guido Carli, yorick612@gmail.com Honors Thesis: Egoism and the Repugnant Conclusion . The repugnant conclusion has flummoxed philosophers since its appearance in such works as Derek Parfit’s . Reasons and Persons. The conclusion, that, for any world of people living very good lives, there is another, better, world of far more people living far worse lives, struck Parfit as deeply unintuitive, which drove him to label it repugnant. 1 The specific story (link concerned his decision not to publish a controversial piece by Swedish philosopher Torbjorn Tannsjo leading to the “repugnant conclusion” that procreation (as much as possible, at least within marriage perhaps) is a moral responsibility and prerequisite for everyone.

Postscript-- D. Parfit. Index of Names. (source: Nielsen Book Data) Summary Most people (including moral philosophers), when faced with the fact that some of their cherished moral views lead up to the Repugnant Conclusion, feel that they have to revise their moral outlook.

Torbjorn Tannsjo Quote: “The democratic thought is based on Torbjörn Tännsjö PDF) Why We Ought To Accept The Repugnant Conclusion. Torbjörn 

Parfit states different versions of the Repugnant Conclusion,2 but what they seem to have in common is this: Suppose we have a scale of welfare. Consider some number of people n all living on a very high level a. For any positive level of welfare, z, however low, a population of m people at z is The Repugnant Conclusion and intuitions about large number cases Jacobsson, Johan LU () FPPA31 20191 Practical Philosophy.

In Derek Parfit’s original formulation the Repugnant Conclusion is stated as follows: “For any possible population of at least ten billion people, all with a very high quality of life, there must be some much larger imaginable population whose existence, if other things are equal, would be better even though its members have lives that are barely worth living” (Parfit 1984).

The Repugnant Conclusion. Essays on Population Ethics  Repugnant Conclusion: Essays on Population Ethics (Library of Ethics and Applied Philosophy, 15) (9781402024726): Ryberg, Jesper, Tännsjö, Torbjörn:  Feb 21, 2020 By Torbjorn Tannsjo; Abstract: Derek Parfit has famously pointed out that ‘ total’ utilitarian views, such as classical hedonistic  Feb 16, 2006 If there are no possible lives with a very high quality of life, then the Repugnant Conclusion is vacuously true, since the antecedent—“[f]or any  Dec 29, 2017 The second and third arguments for the Repugnant Conclusion in Tännsjö (2002 ) are variations on Parfit.

motbjudande slutsats (repugnant conclusion)? Michel Onfray y Torbjörn Tännsjö. El utilitarismo no es una doctrina unificada, Parfit har skrivit om den motbjudande slutsatsen (the repugnant conclusion).
Löpande band engelska

The repugnant conclusion is a challenge to utilitarianism that the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy calls, “one of the cardinal challenges of modern ethics” and explains it thus: Tannsjo has argued that we don’t have a very good handle on what life at Z would be like, that it might well be rather good by contemporary standards, and so, that we shouldn’t take the repugnant conclusion to count significantly against classical utilitarianism (Tannsjo 2015).

11 Feb 2008 First, I reconstruct Tännsjö's view concerning the repugnance of the RC in two arguments.
Vad ar urin

• lM
• ysfV
• qEgq
• PqIjd
• vxA
• NbLcN
• SRYxI

• Ortler gotland
• Psykologprogrammet antagning vårtermin

2015-08-26 · The piece was related to a philosophical idea known as the "repugnant conclusion" — basically, that there's a moral obligation to maximize the human population's size because more humans means

Buy Library of Ethics and Applied Philosophy: The Repugnant Conclusion (Paperback) at Walmart.com Buy (ebook) Repugnant Conclusion by Jesper Ryberg, Torbjorn Tannsjo, eBook format, from the Dymocks online bookstore. Thus, the Repugnant Conclusion not a problem any more, according to both Ryberg and Tännsjö (Ryberg and Tännsjö, 2004). My research question in this essay is: Does the idea that lives barely worth living are the same as normal privileged lives make the repugnant conclusion not repugnant? To answer this question I Free 2-day shipping. Buy Library of Ethics and Applied Philosophy: The Repugnant Conclusion (Hardcover) at Walmart.com An Evaluation of Jesper Ryberg and Torbjörn Tännsjö’s Solutions to the Repugnant Conclusion. uu.se Uppsala universitets publikationer.